
Many lawyers accused of malpractice learn too late that minimal risk management procedures could have prevented the costly claim. Performing a self audit of your law firm’s risk management procedures is an efficient way to determine your firm’s malpractice risks. The new year is a great opportunity for lawyers to perform a self-audit on their current firm risk management practices and procedures.
In order to make the self-audit more manageable, firms may want to consider breaking the project down to a month-by-month audit. The following information offers suggested areas of review and proposed risk management procedures for law firms to implement throughout the year.
January: Client Intake Form
Do attorneys in your firm use a standard client intake form modified by the area of law? Does your law firm have a procedure for transferring information on the intake form to the firm’s centralized calendar? For organizational purposes, attorneys should maintain basic client and case information on an intake form within the client file. Ideally, the intake form should be completed during the initial client interview. The intake interview should address the client background, the nature of the representation, jurisdiction, and opposing parties. The intake form serves as a reminder for the intake attorney to research any statutory, procedural, or administrative deadlines. The critical dates stated on the intake form should be transferred to the law firm’s central calendar. After these critical dates are calendared, the attorney should perform a source documentation review to ensure the dates on the calendar correspond with the dates on the intake form.
February: Conflicts of Interest
How often does your firm perform conflicts of interest checks? A lawyer’s failure to recognize a conflict of interest may result in a malpractice claim for breach of fiduciary duties, and ethics complaint, or both. Motions to disqualify based on a conflict of interest are a common litigation tactic employed by opposing counsel. Clients should be screened for conflicts of interest prior to the initial meeting, after the initial meeting, and throughout the representation. The information maintained in a conflicts of interest checking system will vary according to a firm’s areas of practice and clientele. For more information on conflicts of interest, please visit our website at www.thebarplan.com.
March: Engagement Letters
Does your firm send engagement letters at the beginning of each representation? If not, what is preventing your law firm from incorporating this essential risk management procedure? Engagement letters provide an opportunity for the lawyer to clarify the nature of the relationship to the client. The engagement letter should address the following information:
(1) the identity of the client;
(2) who is not the client (spouses, heirs, co-parties, employees of corporations);
(3) the nature of the representation;
(4) what is not the nature of the representation (ancillary claims, etc.);
(5) a description of services to be rendered;
(6) appropriate methods of communication;
(7) the names of the attorney and support staff who will assist in the representation;
(8) the firm’s file retention policy;
(9) the billing arrangements;
(10) identity of successor lawyer;
(11) the need to maintain current contact information and the consequences of failing to do so, and
(12) acknowledgement of conflicts of interest waivers (if applicable).
April: Non-engagement Letters
Does your firm use non-engagement letters? The non-engagement letter confirms that there is no attorney-client relationship between the law firm and the potential client until the occurrence of a specified event, such as the signing of a fee agreement.Failure to send a non-engagement letter may result in allegations that the attorney failed to adequately protect the potential client’s legal interests. Courts generally determine the existence of the attorney-client through an examination of the client’s reasonable belief that such a relationship exists.
The content of the non-engagement letter should reflect the facts and circumstances as the lawyer knows them to be at the time of the non-engagement. When drafting a non-engagement letter, a lawyer should address the following items:
(1) the declined client’s name and the date of the meeting;
(2) that the matter was taken under consideration and is not being accepted at this time; (3) that declination does not reflect an opinion on the merits;
(4) urge the individual to seek other representation if they desire to pursue the matter;
(5) where a deadline is imminent, strongly urge individual to timely seek other representation and the consequences of failing to do;
(6) if other work in a separate or related matter is to be performed, state the service to be rendered; and
(7) if the attorney received any documents during the interview, such documents should be itemized in the letter and included with the non-engagement letter.
Another way to confirm the absence of an attorney-client relationship is through the use of a non-engagement form completed during the initial interview. At the end of the interview, the lawyer should provide the client with a copy of the non-engagement form.
Regardless of the method you choose to non-engage your potential clients, your office should maintain a copy of the non-engagement letter or intake form in perpetuity as a conflict of interest checking resource and as proof of the declined relationship if one is alleged in the future.
May: Closing Letters
At the conclusion of the representation, does your firm send a closing letter? If so, what case-related issues are addressed in the letter? In addition to protecting the attorney from an unintended on-going attorney-client relationship, a well-drafted closing letter may also be a tool to secure future business from the client.
The first step in drafting a Closing Letter is to review the scope of the representation as set out in the Engagement Letter. Was it accomplished? Did other potential matters, related to the primary representation, arise? Any discrepancies between the anticipated scope of representation and the representation in reality, and the significance of the discrepancies, should be explained in the Closing Letter.
At the end of a representation, the lawyer should have a discussion with the client regarding housekeeping matters related to the representation. These conversations may address the firm’s file retention policy as well as the need to revisit the matter should the client’s life or financial circumstances change. This conversation should be the basis for the closing letter and should contain the following information:
(1) Confirmation that the firm’s representation has concluded and that the attorney-client relationship has ceased;
(2) A final billing statement for legal services rendered;
(3) The firm’s file retention policy; and
(4) A request to serve the client’s future legal needs.
June: Fee Agreements
Does the firm require client-signed fee agreements? Under the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct 4-1.5 Fees, a signed fee agreement is required in contingency fee agreements, where there is a division of fee between lawyers in separate firms, and in limited scope representations under. (see M.R.P.C. 4-1.5(c), 4-1.5(e)(2) and 4-1.2(c) Scope of Representation). Ethical requirements aside, a signed fee agreements is a valuable risk management tool regardless of the nature of the representation. Fee agreements should address the following: the amount of the fee; how the fees will be calculated; the length of billing cycle; and the consequences of the client’s failure to pay his bill.
From a risk management perspective, the lawyer should also include the client’s obligation to inform the attorney of any changes to his contact information or circumstances. This “Responsibilities of the Parties” clause should address the consequences of failing to fulfill those responsibilities. Should the client disappear during the representation and later resurface after the case has been time barred, a “Responsibility of the Parties” clause may allow the attorney to successfully assert an affirmative defense of abandonment. Attorneys in need of drafting guidance should review the sample fee agreements provided by The Missouri Bar Fee Dispute Resolution Program. These sample fee agreements are available on The Missouri Bar website at
www.mobar.org.
July: Billing Procedures
When auditing your law firm’s billing procedures, consider the following: does your firm have a policy for establishing billing arrangements? How does your law firm calculate and bill for its services? Do billing arrangements at your firm include contingent fees retainers, advance fees, flat fees, hourly billing, or a combination of all of the above? Does the firm ever accept representations as co-counsel in a matter? If yes, is the law firm in compliance with the informed consent requirements of Rule 4-1.5(e)? Does the firm charge non-refundable fees or attempt to predicate the rendering of services on payment of fees? These are two common, and unethical, billing issues to address.
This is also an appropriate time to review your law firm’s trust accounting policies to ensure compliance with M.R.P.C. 4-1.15 Safekeeping Property.
August: Calendaring Procedures
Does your firm have a centralized calendaring system? If yes, is there a singleattorney responsible for reviewing the firm’s calendar to ensure deadlines are being met?
A central calendar, reviewable by all employees of the firms, is essential to properly managing firm deadlines. A law firm’s central calendar should account for the following dates and deadlines: statutes of Limitations; pleading deadlines; court dates; discovery response dates; adverse party deadlines; and vacation schedules.
The law firm’s calendaring procedures should include programming heads-up reminders to alert the attorney of a looming deadline. The heads-up reminders should provide the attorney with an adequate amount of time to accomplish the task associated with the deadline.
September: File Retention Policy
Does your firm have written guidelines for file retention? Following case disposition, how long does your law firm maintain the client’s file? Every law firm should have a protocol for the retention and destruction of client files. By creating a file retention policy, the law firm ensures that client files are handled in a manner that meets the lawyer’s fiduciary and ethical obligations. When creating a file retention policy, law firms must consider the nature of their caseload, malpractice statutes of limitations, and storage capacity. Under M.R.P.C. 4-1.15(h) Safekeeping Property, Missouri lawyers are required to securely store the client’s file, absent a contrary agreement between lawyer and client, for 10 years from the last date of representation.
For malpractice avoidance purposes, law firms should maintain an accurate record of the client’s names; the dates the file was opened and closed; the reason for the destruction; the date of destruction; and the attorney authorizing the destruction of the file.
For the most current edition of The Bar Plan’s File Retention Guidelines, please contact our Risk Managers at 314-965-3333 x103.
October: Contingency Plan in the Event of a Lawyer’s Death or Disability
Does your firm have a representation continuity plan in the event of a lawyer’s death or disability? Has your law firm considered what happens to the deceased lawyer’s case? The comment to M.R.P.C. 4-1.2 Diligence suggests that a lawyer designate another competent lawyer to assume responsibilities of the client files in the unexpected death or disability of the designating lawyer. The Missouri Bar has addressed the issue of planning for your clients in the event of your death or disability with the publication of
Planning Ahead: A Guide to Protect Your Client’s and Your Survivor’s Interests in the event of Your Disability or Death. Copies can be downloaded from the Missouri Bar website (
www.mobar.org).
The managing lawyers should also consider the firm’s ability to access the deceased or incapacitated lawyer’s email accounts, Facebook pages, LinkedIn accounts, law firm blogs, voicemail mailboxes, etc. These types of accounts often require passwords to access. If these accounts contain firm or client information, the law firm should implement a policy requiring such passwords bye securely available to the firm in the event access is necessary in the absence of an attorney.
November: Disaster Recovery
If a disaster strikes, does your firm have a business continuity plan that will allow the firm to continue operations? Has the firm studied the potential impact on the firm of various catastrophic events? Does the firm maintain a master client contact list away from the principle firm office? In the event client files are inaccessible or destroyed, the lawyer’s obligations to clients will continue despite the firm’s misfortune. For this reason, law firms should maintain an off-site back-up server as well as a client contact list maintained at a second location.
December: Law Firm Marketing
As lawyers continue to look for innovative ways to market their practice, many of them are turning to the internet to market their law firm. If your firm maintains a website, ensure that the appropriate disclaimers are in place so that your firm does not stumble into an attorney-client relationship or conflict of interest. Furthermore, the law firm should create a firm-wide policy regarding social media policies and procedures
Overall, it is important for lawyers to remember that they take on legal malpractice risks every time they accept or decline a representation or take action on behalf of a client in a case. To avoid risks, there must be an awareness of the existence of possible risk and the specific nature of the risks in a particular situation must be acknowledged and addressed. Attorneys must be willing take appropriate action under the circumstances to minimize or eliminate the exposure to the risk.
Call The Bar Plan Risk Managers at 314-965-3333 x103 to set up an appointment.